What Commodities Are: Priced by Use, Not by Earnings
4 steps · one page
In short
A commodity is a raw material that is interchangeable with any other unit of the same grade — one barrel of a given crude specification is any other barrel, one bushel of a given wheat grade is any other bushel.
That interchangeability is not a detail; it is what makes a commodity market possible, because it lets buyers and sellers who will never meet trade a standardised contract rather than a specific physical lot. Pillar 19 showed the opposite case: when every unit is distinct, liquidity collapses. Here, fungibility is the design.
Hard and soft, and what actually separates them
Hard commodities are extracted — energy and metals, whether industrial or precious. Soft commodities are grown — grains, oilseeds, sugar, coffee, cocoa, cotton, and livestock. The distinction sounds taxonomic and is genuinely useful, because the two respond to different forces on different timescales. Supply response times differ enormously. A mine or an oilfield takes years to bring on and cannot easily be paused; a crop is replanted every season, so a price rise can call forth additional supply within a year in a way it cannot in mining. Weather is a first-order variable for softs and largely irrelevant for hards, which makes agricultural prices more seasonally volatile and more prone to sharp moves on forecasts. Storability differs. Metals can be held almost indefinitely at modest cost; grains degrade; and some energy products are expensive or impractical to store at all — a fact that matters enormously for how their futures curves behave, which is where this pillar's arithmetic centre picks up. And demand behaves differently. Industrial metals and energy track economic activity closely; agricultural staples are relatively inelastic, since people eat regardless; and precious metals have a demand component driven by investment and sentiment rather than by consumption, which is why they get their own article. Two further distinctions the categories obscure. Grade and specification matter more than the name. "Oil" is not one thing — crude varies by density and sulphur content, and contracts specify precisely which, so a headline price refers to a particular benchmark rather than to the substance generally. The same holds for metal purity and grain quality. And location is part of the price. A commodity in the wrong place is worth less than the same commodity where it is needed, so transport, storage, and delivery point are embedded in every quoted figure — which is why the same material trades at different prices in different regions and why benchmark spreads exist.
Why the prices move as they do — and what a holder is actually paid
Three structural features explain most commodity price behaviour, and none of them has an equity analogue. Supply is inelastic in the short run. Production capacity is fixed by prior investment, so when demand shifts, the price rather than the quantity does the adjusting — and the adjustment can be violent. Inventories buffer, until they do not. Stored stock absorbs mismatches between production and consumption, which dampens ordinary fluctuations; when inventories run low, that buffer disappears and prices can move dramatically on small changes. This is why commodity markets can be quiet for long periods and then extremely disorderly — the calm and the violence are the same system in different states. And the cure for high prices is high prices. Elevated prices call forth investment, substitution, and demand destruction, which is a genuine mean-reverting force over long horizons — but the horizon can be a decade, and the reversion is not reliable enough to trade on, which the portal states plainly rather than leaving as an implication. Now the point a reader should take from this article above all others. A share represents a business that generates profits. A bond pays contractual interest. A commodity pays nothing. Holding a physical commodity produces no income and costs money — storage, insurance, financing, and in some cases spoilage. So the total return on a commodity holding is the price change, minus carrying costs, and there is no yield to cushion a flat decade. That is the same structure the crypto opener described, with one genuine and important difference: commodities have use value. Someone needs the copper for wiring and the wheat for flour, and that consumption demand is a real anchor beneath the price — not a guarantee of any particular level, but a floor of a kind that a purely financial asset does not have. A reader should hold both halves of that: no income, and a real underlying use. Neither cancels the other.
Worked example
Worked example (fictional). Three holdings of $100,000 each, held for one year with no price change at all. Aurelis Foods shares paying a 2.5% dividend: the holder ends with $102,500. A bond paying a 4% coupon: $104,000. A precious metal at $2,000 an ounce, held physically with storage and insurance at 0.5% annually: $99,500. Same flat year, three different outcomes, and the difference is entirely structural rather than a matter of anyone being right or wrong. Now extend it. Over five flat years, the metal holder is down about 2.5% on carrying costs alone while the bond holder is up over 21% on coupons — a gap of roughly 24 percentage points produced by nothing happening. That is what "no cash flow" costs over time, and it is why a commodity holding requires a price rise merely to stand still. And the other half. Suppose an industrial disruption cuts supply of that metal by 8% while demand is unchanged. Because short-run supply is fixed and inventories are already low, the price rises 35% — a move no equity with stable earnings would make on an 8% input shock. The same inelasticity that produces the violent upside produces the violent downside, and a holder gets both. (All names and figures fictional; parameters from this pillar's canonical set; five-year figures compound annually.)
Frequently asked
9 questions
What is a commodity?
A raw material interchangeable with any other unit of the same grade — one barrel of a given crude specification is any other barrel. That fungibility is what makes the market possible, because it lets parties who never meet trade a standardised contract rather than a specific physical lot.
What's the difference between hard and soft commodities?
Hard are extracted — energy and metals. Soft are grown — grains, oilseeds, softs like coffee and cocoa, and livestock. The useful part isn't the taxonomy but that they respond to different forces: supply response times, weather sensitivity, storability, and demand behaviour all differ substantially.
Why does supply response time matter?
Because a mine or oilfield takes years to bring on and can't easily be paused, while a crop is replanted each season. A price rise can call forth additional supply within a year in agriculture in a way it cannot in mining, which changes how long a shortage persists.
Is "oil" one thing?
No. Crude varies by density and sulphur content, and contracts specify precisely which — so a headline price refers to a particular benchmark rather than to the substance generally. The same applies to metal purity and grain quality.
Why does location affect the price?
Because a commodity in the wrong place is worth less than the same commodity where it's needed. Transport, storage, and delivery point are embedded in every quoted figure, which is why the same material trades at different prices in different regions.
Why are commodity prices so volatile?
Three structural reasons. Short-run supply is inelastic, so when demand shifts the price rather than the quantity adjusts. Inventories buffer ordinary fluctuations until they run low, at which point the buffer disappears and small changes move prices dramatically. That's why these markets can be quiet for long stretches and then extremely disorderly — the calm and the violence are the same system in different states.
Don't high prices fix themselves?
Over long horizons, yes — elevated prices call forth investment, substitution, and demand destruction, which is a genuine mean-reverting force. But the horizon can be a decade and the reversion isn't reliable enough to trade on.
Do commodities pay income?
No — and holding physical commodities costs money: storage, insurance, financing, and sometimes spoilage. Total return is the price change minus carrying costs, with no yield to cushion a flat decade.
Is that the same as crypto having no cash flow?
Structurally similar, with one genuine difference: commodities have use value. Someone needs the copper for wiring and the wheat for flour, and that consumption demand is a real anchor beneath the price. It isn't a guarantee of any level, but it's a floor of a kind a purely financial asset doesn't have. Hold both halves — no income, and a real underlying use.
References
- CFTC — Customer Advisory: Learn About Risks Before Investing in Commodity ETPs or Funds (commodity futures markets versus securities; contracts do not convey ownership of the asset) —
- FINRA — Alternative and Emerging Products (commodity-linked exchange-traded products) —
- EIA — U.S. Energy Information Administration (energy market data, benchmarks, and specifications) —
Educational and informational only — not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Worked examples use fictional companies and figures.